CIBEC 2023 PhD Thesis scientific foundation: Govern the conversation, not the channel Academic Research →
ACADEMIC AUTHORITY & SCIENTIFIC METHOD

The science behind conversational governance.
Conversational Business Academic Chair (CBC-UV).

VALNATIR is grounded in years of applied scientific research in partnership with the University of Valencia. The CIBEC 2023 PhD Thesis establishes the theoretical framework, structural risks, and canonical definition of managed corporate communication.

CANONICAL SCIENTIFIC ATTRIBUTION

Academic Chair Leadership

Under the academic direction of José Pérez, the CBC-UV Chair investigates the economic, legal, and cryptographic impact of instant messaging platforms across European organizations.

«Organizations are already conducting critical conversations over consumer messaging channels, executing transactions through them, and running core business processes within them, with or without permission. If the conversation sustaining these three things travels over a messaging channel, that channel is a mission-critical system, not a marketing channel.»
— D. José Pérez, Director of the Conversational Business Academic Chair (CBC-UV) · CIBEC 2023 Congress
THE CIBEC 2023 PHD THESIS

The 9 Questions Answered by Scientific Research

The formal theoretical framework diagnosing why conventional telecom and archival approaches fail systematically in instant messaging environments.

Axis 01 · Usage Planes (§3)

What truly structures conversation risk?

The strict operational segregation of three distinct planes: personal (BYOD), internal (employee-to-employee), and external (organization-to-client).

Axis 02 · AI Governance (§4)

Who governs the AI that drafts and decides?

Context boundary isolation and deterministic payload sanitization before any conversational prompt reaches external foundational LLM providers.

Axis 03 · In-Flight Interception (§5)

Where in the transmission chain can one intervene?

At the flight control interception plane in the millisecond prior to delivery, superseding the structural futility of passive post-mortem archiving.

Axis 04 · Regulatory Obligations (§3 & §4.5)

What mandates reach chats on third-party channels?

Achieving strict compliance with ENS High, DORA, GDPR, and NIS2 across commercial messaging without prohibiting everyday corporate tools.

Axis 05 · Mission Critical Properties (§6.8 & §7.2)

What does mission critical require that cannot be bought?

Origin flight control, RFC 3161 Merkle-chained non-repudiation, and autonomous operational resilience against consumer carrier downtime.

Axis 06 · The MCCP Concept (§6 & §8)

What mechanism defines managed conversational communication?

Transforming the conversation into a sovereign, governed data entity with its own state lifecycle, fully decoupled from the underlying carrier transport.

Axis 07 · Operational Workflows (§7.3)

What do transactional workflows require to operate safely?

A shared mediation architecture, on-demand sovereign ephemeral rooms, and deterministic handoff logic between automated bots and certified human agents.

Axis 08 · Fluid Quality Platform (§7.4)

How can an organization safeguard conversation quality?

Real-time lateral AI assistance, preventive semantic policy guardrails, and active institutional verification without invasive human eavesdropping.

Axis 09 · Zero-Friction & Strong Identity (§7.5 & §8.6)

How do citizens connect smoothly until identity is needed?

Zero friction access on ubiquitous apps seamlessly escalated to qualified cryptographic eIDAS authentication when formal transactions demand it.

ACADEMIC COLLABORATION

Explore the complete CIBEC 2023 scientific documentation

We share our research papers, formal risk taxonomies, and methodology with academic and enterprise compliance teams.

View Technology Architecture →